January World Medical Journal Review
Prof. Richard F. Lockey, MD, and WAO Web Editor-in-Chief, reviewed
premier January medical journal articles for practicing allergists. WAOのWeb編集委員長、南フロリダ大学Richard
F. Lockey教授による1月の医学雑誌レビュー
1. Rapid effects of inhaled corticosteroids in acute asthma
Seventeen studies (470 adults and 663 children and adolescents) met
the criteria for inclusion in this review of treatment with inhaled
corticosteroids (ICS) within one to four hours of presentation of an
asthma exacerbation. Final outcomes were admission and ED discharge
rates. After the 2- to 4- hour protocol, a greater reduction of
admission rate was observed in trials that used multiple doses of ICS,
especially when compared with placebo (odds ratio{OR}, 0.30; 95%
confidence interval {CI}, 0.16 to 0.55). ICS patients improve more
rapidly when compared with placebo or systemic corticosteroids (SCS)
increasing the probability of early ED discharge (OR 4.70; 95% CI,
2.97 to 7.42; p = 0.0001). Spirometric and clinical measures improved
as early as 60 minutes with ICS. Benefits were obtained only when
patients received multiple doses of ICS with ß-agonist compared with
placebo or SCS. In conclusion, ICS used early in multiple doses
administered in time intervals of < or = to 30 minutes over 90 to 120
minutes are especially beneficial. Editor's comment: High dose
ICS plus β-agonists used within four hours on multiple occasions for
acute asthma effectively decreases morbidity from severe asthma
exacerbations. Rodrigo GJ,
Chest 2006; 130: 1301
喘息急性発作にステロイド薬はしばしば使用されるが、吸入性ステロイドの有効性に関しては不明な点が多かった。本研究は470名の成人喘息患者、663名の小児喘息患者を対象に発作に対する吸入性ステロイド薬の有効性について救急室における入院と退院の割合や呼吸機能などを指標に検討している。その結果、プラセボと比較し、さらに驚くべきことに全身性のステロイド薬投与との比較においても、吸入性ステロイド薬は急性発作に対し、より有効で2-4時間後の入院の率は低下した。呼吸機能も改善した。
2. Effects of continuing or stopping alendronate (A) after 5
years of treatment
One thousand and ninety-nine (1099) postmenopausal women with a mean of
five years of prior A treatment were randomized to A, 5 mg/d (n = 329)
or 10 mg/d (n = 333), or placebo (P) (n = 437) for five years. Compared
with A, switching to P resulted in declines in bone mineral density (BMD)
at the total hip (P< .001) and spine (P<.001), but mean levels remained
at or were above pretreatment levels 10 years earlier. The cumulative
risk for nonvertebral fractures was not significantly different between
the two groups. Those on A had significantly lower risks of clinically
recognized vertebral fractures (5.3% for P, 2.4% for A) but no
significant reduction in morphometric vertebral fractures (11.3% for P,
9.8% for A). The authors suggest that the discontinuation of A after
five years does not significantly increase the fracture risk, however,
women at high risk of clinical vertebral fractures may benefit by
continuation of A. Editor's comment: Physicians who treat asthma
and allergic and immunologic diseases need to know how to diagnosis and
treat osteopenia and osteoporosis. SG. Black DM, et al.
JAMA 2006; 296: 2927. Editorial, Colón-Emeric C.
JAMA 2006; 296: 2968.
全身性ステロイド薬治療では骨粗鬆症が問題となる。この研究は閉経後の女性を対象に骨代謝ホルモンalendronateの有効性について検討している。その結果、有意な改善は認めなかったとしているが、背椎の骨折の合併症に関しては減少させる可能性もあるとしている。
3. Long-term proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy and risk of
hip fracture
This is a nested, case-control study using a research database from the
United Kingdom. The cohort consisted of users of PPI therapy versus
nonusers of acid suppression drugs older than 50 years. Similar nested,
case-control analysis for histamine 2 receptor antagonists was
performed. The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for hip fractures associated
with more than one year of PPI therapy was 1.44 (95% confidence interval
[CI], 1.30-1.59). For long-term high dose PPIs (AOR, 2.65; 95% CI,
1.80-3.90; P<.001). The risk increased with duration of PPI therapy,
i.e., up to four years. The authors conclude that PPI therapy
significantly increases the risk of hip fracture, possibly secondary to
acid suppression and decreased calcium absorption. Editor's
comment: The risk-benefit of PPI therapy needs to be considered.
Individuals with asthma commonly have gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Using the lowest effective PPI dose and increasing consumption of dairy
products, calcium supplements with meals, and vitamin D therapy make
sense. Yang Y-X, et al.
JAMA 2006; 296: 2947.
プロトンポンプ阻害薬は骨折のリスクを増強させることを示した研究成果である。
4. Asthma, influenza, and vaccination - Review
Influenza (I) viruses, like other viruses, exacerbate asthma (AS) and
are frequently associated with hospitalization. Inactivated I vaccine
(V) does not exacerbate AS. Likewise, medium- or high-dose inhaled or
short-term systemic corticosteroids (CS) do not affect antibody
responses to I A-antigens. High-dose inhaled CS may affect the response,
but this is controversial. There is still a question of whether
inactivated I V prevents the exacerbation of asthma. Live attenuated I
V, given by nasal spray, is better accepted by children and is more
efficacious. Universal I vaccination of all children will facilitate
control of epidemic I and provide an infrastructure for control of
future I pandemics. Editor's comment: I V is indicated for all
asthmatics, and I V immunization of all children will facilitate control
of this disease. Glezen W P,
JACI 2006; 118: 1199.
喘息患者におけるインフルエンザワクチン注射の是非に関する総説である。
5. Anti-IL-5 (MEPOLIZUMAB) therapy for eosinophilic
esophagitis
This is an open-label, phase I/II, safety and efficacy study of
anti-IL-5 in four adult patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) with
longstanding dysphagia and esophageal strictures. They were given three
infusions of anti-IL-5 without a change in current therapy. Peripheral
blood eosinophils and percent of CCR3+ cells decreased by 6.4- and
7.9-fold (P<.05), respectively, as did mean and maximal esophageal
eosinophilia, (P< .001) and (P<.05), respectively. Patients' clinical
outcome and quality of life improved (P = .03) and therapy was
tolerated. IL-5 may be a therapeutic option for EE. Editor's
comment: More studies are needed with anti-IL-5 for EE. Stein
ML, et al.
J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006; 118: 1312.
好酸球性食道炎に対する抗IL-5抗体の効果に関する研究成果である。喘息に対する効果と異なり、臨床症状も改善した。
Numbers 6 & 7 were reviewed by Gary Hellermann, PhD, University of
South Florida, Tampa, Florida
以下6と7のレビューはGary Hellermann先生による。
6. Epidermal RANKL controls regulatory T-cell numbers via
activation of dendritic cells
RANKL, the ligand of RANK (receptor activator of NF-κB), is up-regulated
in keratinocytes when skin is UV irradiated and binds to RANK expressed
on dendritic cells of the skin, the Langerhans cells (LC). The evidence
comes primarily from experiments on transgenic mice over-expressing
RANKL, and these mice show 2-3 times greater systemic numbers of
CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cells (Tregs) than the wild type. The Tregs from
RANKL-transgenic mice suppress effector T cells and produce
characteristic biomarkers such as IL-10. The authors conclude that the
peripheral expansion of Tregs results from an increase in cutaneous
RANKL, which stimulates LC via binding to RANK, to promote proliferation
of Tregs. Editor's comment: Cutaneous stimulation of LC by
increasing RANKL in the presence of a specific antigen may provide a new
treatment for suppressing allergic inflammation. Loser K, et
al.
Nature Medicine 2006; 12: 1372.
皮膚に紫外線を照射するとケラチノサイトにRANKLが強く発現する。このRANKLを強制発現させたマウスではCD4+CD25+
制御性T細胞(Treg)の数が2-3倍に増加し、より多くのIL-10が産生された。RANKLとは内因性のTregアジュバントなのかも知れない。
7. Natural killer T Cells and CD8+ T Cells are dispensable
for T Cell-dependent allergic airway inflammation (AAI)
Das et al compare the contribution of T helper type 2 (Th2) cells,
natural killer T cells (NKT) and CD8+ T cells to AAI. Ovalbumin-sensitized
transgenic mice with gene knockouts that eliminated CD4+ T cells show no
eosinophil infiltrate or increased mucus in the lungs after ovalbumin
challenge. However, mice deficient in NKT and CD8+ T cells had ovalbumin-induced
AAI comparable to the wild type. Therefore, the authors conclude that
NKT cells with or without memory CD8+ cells are not required for AAI.
The authors of an earlier paper (Akbari et al.), which supports the role
of NKT and DC8+ cells in AAI, reply that airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR)
is a better measure of asthma than eosinophilia and mucus production and
cite two studies supporting involvement of NKT cells in AHR. They point
out that while allergen-specific Th2 cells are necessary in allergic
rhinitis, the AHR characteristic of asthma appears to involve NKT cell
regulation of other factors in the lower respiratory tract.
Editor's comment: The complexity of the immune system is legendary, and
the jury is still out on the relative contributions of all players.
Das J, et al.
Nature Medicine 2006; 12: 1345.
NKT細胞とCD8陽性T細胞はTh2細胞に依存したアレルギー性気道炎症に不可欠である。編集者はまだ評決は出ていない(Jury is
still out)とコメントしている。
8. Validation of current joint AAAAI & ACAAI guidelines for
antibody response to the 23 pneumococcal vaccine (PPV) using a
population of HIV-infected children
This case-controlled study compared changes in PPV AB titers in 95
immunocompetent children versus 22 immunodeficient HIV-infected
children, ages 2 to 15 years. Authors confirm the proposed
recommendations of a 4-fold increase in titers after PPV immunization
for at least 50% of the serotypes tested (6 out of 12) as adequate
responses in children between 2 and 15 years. For children who have
previously received the 7-pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, positive
responses for two out of four serotypes not included in this vaccine are
considered adequate. Editor's comment: This study outlines
criteria to accurately identify children who lack optimal responses to
one immunization with PPV. Kamchaisatian W, et al.
JACI 2006; 118: 1336. Potential conflict of interest:
authors are USF colleagues of RFL.
HIVに感染した小児に対する肺炎球菌ワクチンの有効性等について検証し、有効でないものも存在すると述べている。
9. Does allergen-specific immunotherapy represent a
therapeutic option for patients with atopic dermatitis (AD)?
This review article summarizes the evidence associated with house dust
mite (HDM) allergens as an allergic trigger factor for AD. They offer
evidence that the enzymatic activity of HDM facilitates allergenic
penetration into the impaired, epidermal skin barrier of AD inducing
both immediate- and delayed-type reactions which contribute to the
impairment of AD. The authors review data on specific immunotherapy
(SIT) and AD. They conclude that the value of SIT for treatment of AD is
uncertain at this time. Editor's comment: This is must reading
for all physicians who treat severe AD. More controlled studies are
necessary on treatment efficacy of IT for AD. Bussmann C, et
al.
JACI 2006; 118: 1292.
アトピー性皮膚炎に対するアレルゲン特異的免疫療法の是非に関する論文である。現時点では有効性を示すエビデンスはないとのことである。
10. Why do we develop food allergies?
This author reviews how the immune system detects the differences
between food and pathogens in a systematic discussion on how food
represents a special challenge for the immune system of the gut, which
is designed to guard against invaders. In-utero immunologic responses,
secretory immunoglobulin A and oral tolerance all contribute to the
immunologic acceptance of multiple food antigens. The author reviews
work that demonstrates that oral tolerance to food is directly linked to
the development of CD25+ Treg cells. He goes on to state that the
current increase of allergies in industrialized countries is a small
price to pay for the remarkable reduction in infant mortality, provided
by the intermission of pathogens through improved hygiene.
Editors comment: A wonderful update on the pathogenesis of food allergy.
Brandtzaeg P,
American Scientist 2006; 95: 28.
耐性ができるのが当たり前の食物に対して何故、アレルギーになってしまうのかということについて記載された総説である。
11. High prevalence of aeroallergen sensitization among
infants of atopic parents
A birth cohort of infants was first identified from birth records and
enrolled in this study if a parent reported allergic respiratory
symptoms and had a positive skin prick test (SPT) to a common
aeroallergen. At one-year, these infants were tested to the same 15
aeroallergens. Of 680 infants, 28 % were SPT positive to one or more
aeroallergens and/or food and 18 % positive to one or more aeroallergens
(9.7 %, pollen; 7.5 %, molds; 4.3 % house dust mite and/or cockroach;
and 3.4% dog and/or cat). Sixty-six percent remained positive at
2-years. The authors conclude that infants born to atopic parents who
are SPT positive are at increased risk for aeroallergen sensitization
during infancy, which persists to age 2-years and suggest that SPT
before age 2 may be indicated to identify such children.
Editor's comment: Allergic sensitization starts early in life to both
food and inhalant allergens. LeMasters G, et al.
J Pediatrics 2006; 149:505. Potential conflict of interest:
Drs.Grace LeMasters and James Lockey are relatives of RFL.
アレルギー疾患の親から出生した児を対象とした出生コホートの結果が記載されている。一歳の時点で28%の児が皮膚プリックテスト陽性であった。
12. Immunologic response to administration of standardardized
dog allergen extract at differing doses
Cluster immunotherapy was administered to 28 patients with dog allergy
randomly assigned to placebo or an acetone-precipitated extract
containing 0.6 µg, 3.0 µg, or 15 µg Can f 1 per 0.5 ml maintenance dose.
Results show a significant dose-dependant response in suppression of
titrated skin prick tests and delayed cutaneous responses. Dog-specific
IgG4 increased significantly in both high-dose and low-dose therapy, and
there was a dose-dependant suppression of secreted TNF-α and increase in
secreted TGF-ß. Likewise, there was a dose-dependant trend in
suppression of secreted IL-4 with a significant decrease from baseline
in the high-dose group. No changes occurred in symptom scores:
lymphocyte proliferation; secreted IFN-γ , IL-10, or IL-5; or
intracellular cytokine production. The lack of clinical response was
attributed to a misunderstanding in the conduct of nasal challenges
resulting in suboptimal dosing. The authors conclude that a maintenance
dose of 15 µg of Can f 1 produces the greatest and most consistent
immunologic response. Editor's comment: Immunotherapy with
similar doses of Fel d 1 and Can f 1 produces similar immunologic
responses. Lent AM, et al.
JACI 2006; 118:1249.
イヌアレルゲンCan f 1による免疫療法の有効性について記載されている。15 µg の維持量が必要であった。
WAO Now: What's New in the World of WAO
World Allergy Forum
"A Global Perspective on Genetics, the Environment and Allergy"
2007 AAAAI Annual Meeting
Monday, February 26, 2007, 4:45 pm - 6:00 pm
San Diego Convention Center
Upper Level, Room 32 AB
Moderator:
Thomas A. E. Platts-Mills, USA
Co-Moderator:
Michael A. Kaliner, USA
Is Early Exposure to Allergen Protective?
Adnan Custovic, United Kingdom
How Does the Environment Influence Genetic Responses?
Robert F. Lemanske Jr., USA
Environmental Intervention in the Management of Allergic
Diseases
Erika Von Mutius, Germany
2月に開催される米国アレルギー学会の中のWAOシンポジウムの紹介である。

2007 March GLORIA Placements
その他の3月のGLORIAの活動の紹介。
Scientific Meeting of the Association of Allergology and Clinical
Immunology of Serbia and Montenegro
22-24 March 2007
Belgrade, Serbia
International GLORIA Faculty:
Todor Popov
Presentations:
Module 7: Angioedema
Module 9: Diagnosis of IgE Sensitization
South Carolina Society of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology
March 23-25, 2007
Charleston, South Carolina
US GLORIA Faculty:
Allen P. Kaplan
Presentations:
Module 2: Allergic Conjunctivitis
Module 8: Anaphylaxis
GLORIA is supported through unrestricted
educational grants from:
The WAO Henning Løwenstein Research Award 2007
Call for Applications
若い研究者に対する研究奨励の案内。
The WAO Henning Løwenstein Research Award is a biennial award given to a
young scientist who has shown excellence within the field of allergy.
WAO and ALK-Abelló will present the award at the World Allergy Congress
in Bangkok, 2-6 December 2007.
The winner will receive EURO 20,000 together with a travel grant to
attend the Congress.For application guidelines visit
www.alk-abello.com and click on "The WAO Henning Løwenstein Research
Award."
Deadline: 30 June 2007
New Synopsis
Drug Allergies are the focus of the latest educational synopsis to be
posted on the WAO Web site. Written by Bernard Thong, MBBS, MRCP (UK),
FAAAAI, with contributions from Cassim Motala, MD FCPAED(SA) FACAAI
FAAAAI , and Daniel Vervloet, MD FAAAAI, the synopsis provides a
comprehensive overview of immunological and non-immunological adverse
drug reactions. To read this new synopsis in WAO's Allergic Diseases
Resource Center,
click here.
新しいアレルギー関連小冊子の案内。薬剤アレルギーが加わった。
WAO Conversations:
We have the pleasure of announcing four new interviews with
well-respected allergists. Take a moment to
listen to them sharing their extensive knowledge.
- Prof. Stephen Durham - Mechanisms of Immunotherapy
- Dr. Thomas Platts-Mills - Indoor Allergen Control
- Prof. Carlos Baena-Cagnani - History and Vision of the World
Allergy Organization
- Dr. Harold Nelson - How do you properly mix Allergen Vaccines?
MP3プレイヤーにダウンロードして聴く、WAO conversationの紹介。
El-Ghoneimy Short-Term Fellowship Report
Dr. Dalia El-Ghoneimy from Cairo, Egypt, spent her WAO Short-Term
Research Fellowship in the laboratory of Prof. G. Walter Canonica in
Genoa, Italy, studying skin prick testing in the early diagnosis of
atopy in infants and children and immunotherapeutic modalities. The
objective of her fellowship was to receive the necessary training to
enable her to identify the major allergens to which infants in Egypt are
sensitized and the possible immunotherapeutic interventions needed. To
read Dr. El-Ghoneimy's report on her fellowship,
click here.
Sign up for On-Line Journal Subscription -
WAO and Hogrefe & Huber Publishers are offering a limited number of free
on-line subscriptions to Allergy & Clinical Immunology International -
Journal of the World Allergy Organization for members in developing
countries. If you are interested in receiving a complimentary, on-line
subscription, please send an e-mail to
info@worldallergy.org, noting "Free Journal Subscription" in the
subject line, with the following details:
First name
Last name
Postal address
City, State/Province and postal code
Country
E-mail address
Name of Member Society
And In Other News
Allergy Book Reviews
Allergy in Practice
Author: Johannes Ring
Editor: Marion Philipp
ISBN #: 978-3-540-00219-2
List price: $129.00 USD
Available from:
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
NOTE: The book, Allergy in Practice, was reviewed by two
different reviewers, as follows.
Johannes Ring教授らによる教科書Allergy in
Practiceの紹介文です。2名の批評が掲載されています。
First review of Allergy in Practice
Reviewer: Ron Purcell, MD
University of South Florida College of Medicine and James A. Haley
Veterans Hospital, Tampa, FL, USA
Description:
Allergy in Practice is a concise yet remarkably thorough
overview of allergic disease and provides the reader with a basic
understanding of the physiology, diagnosis, and treatment of commonly
encountered allergic conditions. This is an updated version of the 2nd
edition printed in 1988 and reflects the many changes in the field
over the past 20 years.
Purpose:
This book is written to provide the reader with a better understanding
of the recognition and treatment of allergic diseases commonly
encountered in the clinical setting. It does not cover
immunodeficiency, rheumatology or other immunologic conditions except
as they relate specifically to allergy.
Audience:
Medical students, physicians in training, and other health care
professionals looking for an introduction to the clinical practice of
allergy will find this to be an excellent resource. It also serves
well as a reference for health care professionals who want rapid
access to clinically useful information regarding the field of
allergy.
Features:
Without a doubt, the book's strong point is the author's exceptional
ability to present information in a concise, straightforward manner.
Despite being only 276 pages and measuring 25 X 17 cm, the book covers
nearly every aspect of allergy in such a way that the reader can
quickly grasp even difficult concepts. Each section is clearly
delineated and rarely exceeds two pages; many are only one or two
paragraphs. Despite this brevity, explanations are thorough and
complete. The clinical sections are organized logically and make
generous use of tables, so differential diagnosis, common physical
findings, and other practical information can be quickly accessed.
Extensive cross referencing of sections allows the reader to easily
locate related concepts or conditions. Additional chapters covering
allergen immunotherapy and diagnostic techniques, such as skin
testing, provide insight into how these are accomplished by
specialists trained in these procedures.
Assessment:
Anyone wishing to increase their understanding of the diagnosis and
management of allergic disease in a concise, readable format will find
this to be an excellent resource.
Second review of Allergy in Practice
Reviewer: Salvador Gala, MB BS PhD
University of Sydney
Description:
Prof. Ring states his book evolved from a series of information
leaflets and short chapters for residents rotating through his Allergy
Division. Thus, the underlying theme reflecting a detailed but concise
introduction to allergic disease is evident throughout Allergy in
Practice. There are the standard chapters on allergic mechanisms,
clinical evaluation, diagnostic tests and therapy. However, grouping
of allergic disorders within the main body of the text is
predominantly according to the Gell and Coombs classification, wherein
clinical information appears within a scheme of pathophysiology.
Nevertheless, this approach works quite well; the reviewer was easily
able to navigate throughout the different subsections of the book when
searching for specific pieces of information. As the sole author,
Prof. Ring eschews those problems of excess, irrelevant detail and
redundancy so commonly observed in multi-authored comprehensive texts.
Purpose:
Allergy in Practice provides the trainee and non-specialist
reader with a detailed but concise introduction to the field of
allergy. Prof. Ring covers all major subject areas relevant to the
basic science and clinical management of allergic disease. It is, in
essence, a textbook - but written in a user-friendly style.
Audience:
Whilst easy to follow, Allergy in Practice is pitched at the
specialist level. This book is, therefore, ideal as a study aid for
allergy trainees and residents undertaking an allergy rotation and as
a refresher for allergy specialists. Non-allergist physicians
requiring specific information on allergic disorders will more readily
find answers here, rather than trying to negotiate larger
comprehensive allergy texts.
Features:
The positive qualities to Allergy in Practice are plentiful.
Descriptions of individual allergic disorders are detailed but
concise. Those aspects of basic science chosen for review are all
clinically relevant. High-quality color photography is included
throughout the book to demonstrate important clinical, radiological
and histological points within the main text. Prof. Ring makes
frequent use of schematic multi-color diagrams to convey important
concepts without, however, becoming entrenched in overly complicated
detail. Lists and tables accompanying the text are useful for clinical
reference because they achieve a balance between sufficient detail and
conciseness. References are very selective and included on the basis
of clinical relevance.
Does the book have any drawbacks? Its advantages are at the same time
its limitations. The reader will still need access to comprehensive
textbooks and journals for details of rare conditions, in-depth
reviews, and more up-to-date information. Inclusion of an Appendix
serves to partly address these issues by directing the reader towards
additional sources of information.
Assessment:
Prof. Ring's publication represents a clinically useful, high-quality
'entry-level' allergy textbook. As summarized by Prof. Platts-Mills in
his foreword to Allergy in Practice, Prof. Ring provides a
comprehensive but well planned description of allergic disorders "that
are either very common or just common." Allergy in Practice
is designed for use as an introductory textbook, to be studied
cover-to-cover and complemented by reading of current literature.
Find more allergy book reviews on the WAO Website
here. |